The Prevalence of Undernutrition and Associated Factors Among Children Aged One to Five Years in Siyambalanduwa MOH Area

A.M.U.P Kumari, S Ginige

1Epidemiology Unit, Post graduate MD trainee-Community Medicine, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka.

2Consultant Epidemiologist, Epidemiology Unit, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka.

 *Correspondence Author: Kumari AMUP, Epidemiology Unit, Post graduate MD trainee-Community Medicine, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka, Tel: +94 112 675 449; Fax: +94 112 675 449; E-mail: abeykoonprabha@gmail.com

 Citation: A.M.U.P Kumari, S Ginige (2022) The Prevalence of Undernutrition and Associated Factors Among Children Aged One to Five Years in Siyambalanduwa MOH Area. Pediatr Primary Physic 2: 111.

 Copyright: © 2022 A.M.U.P Kumari, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

 Received date: November 14, 2022; Accepted date: November 27, 2022; Published date: December 03, 2022.

Abstract

Introduction: High prevalence of child undernutrition is a well-known issue in rural areas of Si Lanka. Identification of real burden, underlying specific causes and addressing those issues will help to improve the nutritional status of those children.

Objective: To describe the prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among children aged one to five years in Siyambalanduwa MOH area.

Methodology: A community based cross-sectional study was conducted among 421 child-mother pairs in Siyambalanduwa MOH area using two stage cluster sampling method. Data collection done by using pre-tested interviewer administered questionnaire. Relevant anthropometric measurements were done according to WHO slandered guidelines. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 20. The chi-square test was used, and P

Results: Overall 41% of children aged 1-5 years were undernourished in Siyambalanduwa MOH area. Among the study subjects 24% were underweight, 25.7% were stunted, 16.4% were wasted, 9.2% were both   underweight & stunted, 6.8% were both, underweight & wasted, 0.5% were both stunted & wasted and 9.9% were underweight & stunted g & wasted. Only the low total monthly income (P<0.001) and low birth weight (P<0.001) were significantly associated with child undernutrition.

Conclusions and recommendations: Prevalence of undernutrition among children aged 1-5 years is unacceptably high and urgent efforts to reduce undernutrition should be a priority. Future studies should focus on assessing how to reduce the burden of undernutrition with low cost interventions.

Keywords

Keywords: Undernutrition, Children aged 1-5 years, Siyambalanduwa

Introduction

Undernutrition is defined as the outcome of insufficient food intake and repeated infectious diseases. It includes being underweight for one's age, too short for one's age (stunted), dangerously thin for one's height (wasted) and deficient in vitamins and minerals (micronutrient malnutrition) (UNICEF, 2006). Globally nearly half of all deaths among children under 5 years are mainly due to direct or indirect effects of undernutrition. That is about 3 million young lives a year! (UNICEF, 2015) [1-4].

According to the UNICEF conceptual framework there are three levels of causes responsible for child undernutrition. First the immediate causes which include the individual factors as inadequate dietary intake and diseases. Second the underlying causes which associate with family and community namely food, health and care. Third the basic causes which relate to social structure, e.g.  A government that lack incentives for leaders to perform interventions to reduce undernutrition makes it hard to implement political initiatives and deliver services to the citizens. All forms of undernutrition will create negative effects on health of a child [5]. The main indicators used to monitor the growth of children in the national programme are weight for age (underweight), length/height for age (stunting) and weight for height (wasting).

The Nutrition and food security survey of Sri Lanka highlighted that even though many nutritional interventions (direct food assistance, food supplementation, food subsidies and poverty alleviation programmes) have been implemented over the decades targeting vulnerable populations, still maternal and child undernutrition remains as a significant public health issue in Sri Lanka (Nutrition and Food security survey report, 2009) [6,7].

In Sri Lankan setting, growth monitoring and promotion are the main strategies used to reduce undernutrition among children.  Regular measurement of height and weight and plotting on the growth chart will indicate early slowing down of growth before appearing of signs and symptoms. Therefore it provides an early warning to the mother and health care worker about the nutritional condition of a child [8]. Every public health midwife (PHM) is supposed to weigh all the children up to 5 years under her care either at well baby clinics or at field weighing posts.

Monaragala is considered as a district with relatively high prevalence of all forms of undernutrition (underweight, wasting and stunting) among children, where siyambalanduwa is one MOH division situated in the administrative district of Moneragala. According to the National nutrition and micronutrient survey 2012, prevalence of severe acute malnutrition among under 5 children in Moneragala district was 3.7% while the national figure was (2.3%) [9,10] (National nutrition and micronutrient survey, 2012).

Therefore it is essential to identify the real burden of undernutrition and some of the key associated factors which will also help stakeholders and donors to identify the key underlying causes leading to undernutrition among children in Siyambalanduwa Divisional Secretariat area and take timely appropriate measures in future to improve their nutritional status [11]. Therefore the objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of undernutrition and associated factors among children aged one to five years in Siyambalanduwa MOH area.

Methods

This was a community based descriptive cross-sectional study. Study Population was child-mother pair of children aged 1-5years, who lives in Syabalanduwa MOH area for least one year or more at the time of data collection and registered in the Birth and immunization register. The sample size was computed using the prevalence of underweight as 21% [12] (National Nutritional Policy of Sri Lanka, 2010), a precision of 5% at a significance level of 5%. Calculated sample size was 255. The final sample was increased to 422 with a design effect of 1.5 and 10% non-response rate.

Two stage cluster sampling method was used to identify the study subjects. Out of total number of 22 PHM areas twelve PHM areas were randomly selected using computer generated random numbers. A group of mother-child (1-5 years of age) pairs within a selected PHM area was defined as a cluster [13-15]. The children were selected using computer generated random numbers using birth and Immunization register of index PHM area as a sampling frame. Information was gathered from the selected children’s caregivers. Inability to meet the caregiver in two consecutive days was considered as non-respondent. 

A pretested interviewer administered questionnaire was used to collect socio demographic information of mother, father and index child, data related to maternal and childhood factors and the knowledge, attitudes and practices related to child nutrition. Weight was measured to the nearest 0.01Kg using standardized spring balance scales and height was measured to the nearest centimeter using a standardized stadiometers [16,17]. For children less than two years a length measuring board was used. Data were collected on all seven days of the week by two well-trained pre-intern doctors.

Children who were more than two standard deviations below the reference median values for weight and height were considered to be undernourished (stunted, wasted or underweight) (UNICEF, 2006). Separate growth charts were used for boys and girls. Data were analyzed using SPSS software [18]. Chi-square test was used to verify the statistical significance of the associations at P<.05.

A written informed consent indicating ‘no penalty’ for not participating in the study was obtained from allparticipants prior to the interview [19]. Ethical clearance was obtained from PGIM Ethics Review Committee.

Results

The overall response rate was 98% (413/421). The children participated were between the age group 13-60 months. (Mean 31.9 months/SD=13.59/ median 32months). The basic socio-demographic characteristics of children were described in table 1.

Table 1: Distribution of basic socio-demographic characteristics of children aged 1-5 years.

Socio-demographic characteristics

Frequency   N=413

Percentage (%)

Sex

 

 

Male

200

 48.4

Female

213

 51.6

Birth order

 

 

1st

181

 43.8

2nd

153

 37.0

3rd

  65

 15.8

4th

  12

  2.9

5th or higher

    2

  0.5

No of siblings in the family

 

 

1

157

 38.0

2

152

 36.8

3

  86

 20.8

4

  14

  3.4

5 and above

    4

  1.0

Child routinely lives with

 

 

Both mother and father

297

 71.9

Mother only

106

 25.7

Grand parents

    9

   2.2

Father only

    1

   0.2

Others

 

 

Age gap (years) B/W index child and immediately younger child

 

 

<1

  28

    6.8

≥1 - <2

  28

    6.8

≥2 - <3

    4

    1.0

≥3

    1

    0.2

Not applicable

352

  85.2

Age gap (years) B/W index child and immediately older child

 

 

<1

  15

   3.6

≥1 - <2

  62

 15.0

≥2 - <3

  83

 20.1

≥3

  66

 16.0

Not applicable

187

 45.3

Nearly equal proportion of boys and girls were seen. Majority of children (297: 71.9%) were routinely living with both parents and 25.7% (N=106) routinely lives with mother only [20]. All were from Sinhala families and the majority (80.8%) of the study sample comprised of either first (44%) and second (37%) born children. Hundred and fifty nine families (30%) have one child and 36.8% have two while there were only 4(1%) families have five and above. On analyzing the age gap between the index child and immediately younger child 352 (85.2%) were youngest in the family [21]. Nearly 12% of the study subjects reported age gap less than 2 years between the index child and immediately younger child. The table 2 indicates that out of study population 40.7% (N=168) study subjects were undernourished and table 3 shows the distribution of undernutrition among the undernourished group.

Table 2: Distribution of overall nutritional status of the study subjects.

Nutritional status

Frequency

N=413

Percentage (%)

Wellnurished

   245

   59.3

Undernurished

   168

   40.7

Total

   413

 100.0

 

Table 3: Distribution of undernutrition among the study subjects.

Undernutrition status

Frequency

N=168

Percentage   %

Underweight

    37

    21.8

Stunted

    39

    23.0

Wasted

    19 

    11.2

Underweight+Stunted

    38

    22.4

Underweight+Wasted

    29

    16.1

Stunted+Wasted

    02

      0.2

Underweight+Stunted+Wasted

    18

      9.6

Total

  168

 100.0

Table 4 describes the association of undernutrition with selected maternal socio-demographic characteristics of the children. Seven percent of undernourished children compared to 4% of wellnourished children with mothers’ education level less than grade 5 and not schooled [22].  Similarly 28% of mothers of well-nourished children were educated up to A/L or above compared to 22% of under nourished children but difference was statistically not significant (P=0.18). No significant association was observed with employment status and planning status of the pregnancy between mothers of wellnourished children and undernourished children.

Table 4: Association of undernutrition with selected maternal socio-demographic characteristics of the study population.

Selected characteristic

Wellrnurished Number (%)

undernourished Number (%)

Chi-square value

Level of significance

Age at the birth of IC (years)

 

 

 

 

<19

   18 (7.3)

   11 (6.5)

 0.83

P=0.39

20-29

 148 (60.4)

   96 (57.1)

df=1#

NS

30-39

   76 (31.0)

   57 (33.9)

 

 

40-49

     3 (1.2)

     4 (2.4)

 

 

Level of education

 

 

 

 

No schooling

    4 (1.6)

    0 (0.0)

 2.12

P=0.18

Grade 1-5

    6 (2.4)

  12 (7.1)

df=1##

NS

Grade 6- 10

  23 (9.4)

  20 (11.9)

 

 

O/L

144 (58.8)

100 (59.5)

 

 

A/L

  58 (23.7)

  29 (17.3)

 

 

Degree, Diploma or Higher

  10 (4.1)

    7 (4.2)

 

 

Employment status

 

 

 

 

Employed

  26 (10.6)

   15 (8.9)

 0.31

P=0.57

Not employed

219 (89.4)

 153 (91.1)

df=1

NS

Planning status of the pregnancy

 

 

 

 

Want to become pregnant

 204 (83.3)

  138 (82.1)

 0.43

P=0.80

Wanted to postponed

   22 (9.0)

    14 (8.3)

df=2

NS

Not want to have any more children

  19 (7.8)

    16 (9.5)

 

 

 

# Rows 1,2 & 3,4 were amalgamated for chi-square analysis

##Rows 1,2,3,4 and 5,6 were amalgamated for chi-square analysis

Table 5 describes the economic status and wealth index quintiles of children. The wealth index was developed according to housing characteristics [10] (National nutrition and micronutrient survey, 2012).

Table 5: Association of undernutrition with econonic status and wealth index quintiles of the children aged 1-5 years.

Characteristic                                   wellnurished undernurished        Chi-square          Level of

                                                            Number        %       Number        %         value              significance

Characteristic

Wellnurished Number (%)

Undernourished Number (%)

Chi-square value

Level of significance

Total income (Rupees)      

 

 

 

 

<5000

14 (5.7)

13 (7.7)

 7.9

P=0.001

≥5000-<10000

34 (13.9)

27 (16.1)

df=2#

S

≥10000-<15000

25 (10.2)

30 (17.9)

 

 

≥15000-<20000

33 (13.5)

19 (11.3)

 

 

≥20000-<25000

19 (7.8)

11 (6.5)

 

 

≥25000-<30000

21 (8.6)

20 (11.9)

 

 

≥30000-<35000

48 (19.6)

24 (14.3)

 

 

≥35000-<40000

17 (6.9)

11 (6.5)

 

 

≥40000-<45000

15 (6.1)

  6 (3.6)

 

 

≥45000-<50000

  9 (3.7)

  4 (2.4)

 

 

≥50000

10 (4.1)

  3 (1.8)

 

 

Wealth Index quintile

 

 

 

 

Lowest

7 (2.9)

    6 (3.6)

 0.63

P=0.42

Second

10 (4.1)

  17 (10.1)

df=1##

 

Middle

137 (55.9)

  89 (53.0)

 

 

Fourth

  78 (31.8)

  53 (31.5)

 

 

Richest

  13 (5.3)

    3 (1.8)

 

 

 

#Rows 1,2,3& 4, 5, 6 & the rest were amalgamated for chi-square analysis

##Rows 1,2,3& 4, 5 were amalgamated for chi-square analysis

In the well nourished group 4.1% of families have reported total monthly income more than Rs 50000 compared to 1.8% in the undernourished group. Among the undernourished group 41% of families reported total monthly family income less than Rs 15000 compared to 30% in the well nourished group [23]. This observed difference in the total household monthly income was statistically significant (P<0.001). Although among the undernourished group 2% belonged to the richest quintile compared to 5% in the wellnorished group the observed difference was not statistically significant.

Table 6: Association of undernutrition with selected characteristics of the index children aged 1-5 years.

Characteristic of study subjects

Wellnurished Number   %

Undernurished Number   %

Chi-square value

Level of significance                                                                                                                                          

Age (in months)

 

 

 

 

13-24

  69    28.2

  43    25.6

 1.3

P=0.25

25-36

 131    53.5

  94    56.0

df=1#

NS

37-48

   44    18.0

  30    17.9

 

 

49-60

     1      0.4

    1      0.6

 

 

Sex

125    51.0

 75    44.6

 1.62

P=0.20

Male

120    49.0

 93    55.4

df=1

NS

Female

 

 

 

 

Birth weight in kg

 

 

 

 

<2.5

 139     56.7

 131    78.0

 19.86

P=0.001

≥2.5

 106     43.3

   37    22.0

df=1

S

Birth order

 

 

 

 

First

114     46.5

  67   39.9

 2.23

P=0.13

Second

  90     36.7

  63   37.5

df=1##

NS

Third

  32     13.1

  33   19.6

 

 

Fourth

    8       3.3

    4     2.4

 

 

Fifth or higher

    1       0.4

    1     0.6

 

 

Total number of siblings

 

 

 

 

One

101     41.2

   56     33.3

 1.73

P=0.23

Two

  88     35.9

   64     38.1

df=1###

NS

Three

  43     17.6

   43     25.6

 

 

Four

  10       4.6

     4       2.4

 

 

Five and above

    3       1.2

     1       0.6

 

 

 # Rows 1,2& 3,4 were amalgamated for chi-square analysis

##Rows 1,2& 3,4,5 were amalgamated for chi-square analysis

###Rows 1,2& 3,4,5 were amalgamated for chi-square analysis

Table 6 describes the association of undernutrition with selected characteristics of the index children [24]. There were no obvious different observed between well nourished and under nourished children in relation to their age at the time of study but higher prevalence of undernutrition was seen among girls [55.6% (N=93)] compared to boys [44.6% (N=75)]. None of the characteristics of study subjects assessed show a significant association with their nutritional status except birth weight of the child (P=0.001).

Discussion

Out of study population 40.7% (N=168) study subjects were undernourished. Higher prevalence of undernutrition was seen among girls [55.6% (N=93)] compared to boys [44.6% (N=75)]. Similar results shown by the nutrition and food security survey done in Monaragala district (2010); stunting (Male; 22.4%: Female; 24%), wasting (Male; 11.9%: Female; 13.6%) and underweight (Male; 23.1%: Female; 31.8%) [25]. Siyambalanduwa being a highly rural area with traditional preference on male children on feeding and care may be a one possible reason for the observed increased undernutrition among girls compared to boys.

When considering undernutrition according to age groups, 37-48 month (4th year) age group accounts for highest underweight (32.9%:N=29) and wasting (20.4%:18) prevalence while stunting is more prevalent (28.5%:N=16) in the age group of 49-60 (5th year) months. In contrast to the national level, second year accounts for the highest prevalence of stunting (16.9%) while the prevalence of underweight and wasting was highest during the fourth year (31.1% and 26% respectively) [10] (National nutrition and micronutrition survey,2012). These findings were compatible with the national figures for underweight and wasting indicating the accuracy of the study but for the higher prevalence of stunting in the fourth year than in the national figure of second year may be due to the specific practices of the mothers of the study group (good practices 12.8%, average 78%, poor practices 9.2%).

The prevalence of underweight, stunting and wasting of children aged one to five years in Siyanbalanduwa MOH area at the time of the study was 72%, 58% and 40% respectively [26]. According to the nutrition and food security survey (2010) done in Monaragala district there were 23.2% underweight, 18.5% stunted and 11.8% wasted. The observed disparities indicated that further deterioration of the nutritional status among children in the area over the last five years. The only socio-demographicfactor which is significantly associated with undernutrition of children according to this study was total monthly income (P=0.001).

Sex ratio of the study sample had been 200 boys to 213 girls (48.4%: 51.6%). The prevalence of undernutriition 44.6% (N=75) among boys while 55.6% (N=93) in girls. Similar results shown by the nutrition and food security survey done in Monaragala district (2010) stated as following; stunting (Male; 22.4%: Female; 24%), wasting (Male; 11.9%: Female; 13.6%) and underweight (Male; 23.1%: Female; 31.8%) [27-29].

In contrast the evidence from Sri Lankan national level studies highlighted that marginally higher prevalence of stunting (Male; 15.5%: Female; 14.5%) and wasting (Male; 22.6%: Female; 21.1%) among boys while higher prevalence of underweight among girls (M; 26.1%: F; 28.5%) [10] (National nutrition and micronutrition survey, 2012).

Except low birth weight (16%) no other maternal or child related factor studied significantly associated with undernutrition [30-32]. The national figure for low birth weight was 16.3% per 100 live births in government hospitals (Annual health bulletin, 2012). According to the study low birth weight was significantly associated with undernutrition (P<0.001, CI=0.23-0.57). The reason for high percentage of low birth weight may be due to high rates of maternal anemia [55.5% among pregnant mothers (Nutrition and food security survey, Monaragala district, 2010)] in addition to high rates of low maternal BMI. [36.8% low BMI among pregnant women in Monaragala district (Nutrition and food security survey, Monaragala district, 2010)]. On the other hand the high rates of elective (14.4 %: N= 59) and emergency cesarean sections (12.3%: N=51) may also be additional causes for low birth weight [33,34].

Conclusions

The study revealed that undernutrition is a problem that affects 40.7% of children aged one to five years in Siyambalanduwa MOH area. The factors that were significantly associated with undernutrition of children according to this study were total monthly income (P=0.001) and Birth weight (P=0.001, CI=0.23-0.57) concluding poor people suffer from undernutrition.

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

References

  1. Abedi AJ, Srivastava JP (2010) The effect of vaccination on nutritional status of pre-school children in rural and urban Lucknow. Hindu 193: 48-50.
  2. Ahmed S, Sharma BK, Sharma s, Mahashabde P, Bachhotiya A, et al. (2014) Effects of birth interval on nutritional status of under five children in Periurban, India. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health 3.
  3. Chowdhury F, Chisti MJ, Hossain MI, Malek MA, Salam MA, et al. (2011) Association between paternal smoking and nutritional status of under-five children attending Diarrhoeal Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Acta Paediatrica 100: 390-395.
  4. Correia LL, Silva AC, Campos JS, Andrade FM, Machado MM, et al. (2014) Prevalence and determinants of child undernutrition and stunting in semiarid region of Brazil. Rev Saude Publica 48: 19-28. [crossref] 
  5. De Silva SP, De Silva H, Waldeniyage I, Prasanna K, Karunamuni C, et al. (2000) Nutritional status of preschool children and its associates: A Sri Lankan experience of a fishing community. Journal of Child Health 29: 88-92.
  6. Department of Census and Statistics (2003) Nutritional Status of Pre-School Children in Sri Lanka. Department of Census and Statistics, Sri Lanka. Research and Special Studies Division Sri Lanka 1-7.
  7. Fathea EN, Salama AA, Elhawary D (2014) Nutritional knowledge, attitude, and practice of parents and its impact on growth of their children. Menoufia Medical Journal 27: 612-616.
  8. Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady D, Hearst N, et al. (2001) Designing Clinical Research: An Epidemiological Approach. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  9. Jayatissa R, Hossaine SMM (2010) Nutrition and Food Security Assessment in Sri Lanka 2009. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Medical Research Institute, UNICEF and World Food Programme. (Medical Research Institute, UNICEF, World Food Programme. (2009)).
  10. Medical Research Institute, Ministry of Health, UNICEF. (2012) National Nutrition and Micronutrient survey.
  11. Kapçi N, Akçam M, Koca T, Dereci S, Kapci M, et al. (2015) The nutritional status of hospitalized children: Has this subject been overlooked?. The Turkish journal of gastroenterology: the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology 26: 351-355.
  12. Ministry of Healthcare and Nutrition (2010) National Nutrition Policy of Sri Lanka. Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka. Available at: http://www.health.gov.lk.
  13. 2010Kurup PJ, Khandekar R (2004) Low birth weight as a determinant of protein energy malnutrition in "0-5 years" Omani children of South Batinah region, Oman. Saudi medical journal 25: 1091-1096.
  14. Lwanga SK, Lemeshow S (1991) Sample size determination in health studies: a practical manual.
  15. Mahgoub SEO, Nnyepi M, Bandeke T (2006) Factors affecting prevalence of malnutrition among children under three years of age in Botswana. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development 6: Code Number: nd06006.
  16. Makoka D (2013) The impact of maternal education on child nutrition: evidence from Malawi, Tanzania, and Zimbabwe. Calverton, MD: ICF International.
  17. Ministry of Health (2007) Guideline on Infant and Young Child Feeding. Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka.
  18. Ministry of Health (2012) Annual Health Bulletin. Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka.
  19. Ministry of Health (2012) National Policy on Maternal and Child Health. Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka.
  20. Munos MK, Walker CLF, Black RE (2010) The effect of oral rehydration solution and recommended home fluids on diarrhoea mortality. International journal of epidemiology 39: i75-i87.
  21. Peiris T, Wijesinghe D (2011) Nutritional status of under 5 Year-old children and its relationship with maternal nutrition knowledge in Weeraketiya DS division of Sri Lanka. Tropical Agricultural Research 21: 330-339.
  22. Rahman MM (2015) Is Unwanted Birth Associated with Child Malnutrition In Bangladesh?. International perspectives on sexual and reproductive health 41: 80-88.
  23. Semba RD, Kalm LM, Pee SD, Ricks MO, Sari M, et al. (2007) Paternal smoking is associated with increased risk of child malnutrition among poor urban families in Indonesia. Public health nutrition 10: 7-15.
  24. Senarath U, Siriwardena I, Godakandage SS, Jayawickrama H, Fernando DN, et al. (2012) Determinants of breastfeeding practices: an analysis of the Sri Lanka Demographic and Health Survey 2006–2007. Maternal & child nutrition 8: 315-329.
  25. Seneviratne ADS (2003) A study of maternal awareness of acute diarrhoeal disease.
  26. Shahjada A, Sharma BK, Sharma S, Mahashabde P, Bachhotiya A, et al. (2014) Effects of birth interval on nutritional status of underfive children in periurban area of Madhya Pradesh, India. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health 3: 723-726.
  27. Silva Ad, Mahamithawa AM, Piyasena C (2009) Maternal & child nutrition: the Sri Lankan perspective. Indian J Med Res 130: 609-611. [crossref] 
  28. Subramanian SV, Ackerson LK, Smith GD (2010) Parental BMI and childhood undernutrition in India: an assessment of intrauterine influence. Pediatrics 126: e663-e671.
  29. UNICEF, World Health Organization, The World Bank (2012) UNICEF-WHO- World Bank. Joint Child Malnutrition Estimates: Levels & trends in child malnutrition. Africa, 35.
  30. UNICEF (2013) Improving child nutrition. The achievable imperative for global progress.
  31. United Nations Children`s Fund (UNICEF) (2011) Programming Guide: Infant and Young Child Feeding – Unicef.
  32. United Nations Children`s Fund (UNICEF) (2011) Programming Guide: Infant and Young Child Feeding Unicef.
  33. United Nations Children`s Fund (UNICEF) (2012) Nutritional Status in Sri Lanka, Determinants and interventions: a desk review. Regional Office for South Asia, UNICEF.
  34. United Nations Children`s Fund (UNICEF) Our Focus Areas. UNICEF Sri Lanka.